Final Thoughts on 2nd Presidential Debate

Ok at this is getting kind of infuriating. There were far too many sound bites and canned lines in that. Brokaw should have let them get into it more. Now is the time to hash out the details and these events need to be more than a recitation of talking points. There were almost fruitful exchanges but every time they’d get started they’d be pulled back by Brokaw. In all fairness he seemed frustrated by the format too but apparently it was agreed by the campaigns that there would not be follow-ups which to me makes the whole thing sort of one big jerk off. I realize that is a rude thing to say but it’s true.

The questions were almost all excellent and pointed and really got to the heart of the things that the voters want to know from these two men and to some degree they were answered but too often the heart of a question was ignored. I would love to hear how McCain plains to achieve peace with something other than the military or economic sanctions which amount to a war on the common person by denying them medicine and food. I would like to have some insight into how John McCain integrates new pieces of information into his thought process because from the looks of it he hasn’t changed an opinion in a long time. We’ve just suffered through 8 years of a president who couldn’t deal with constructive criticism and we can’t afford 4 more.

Obama was good for the most part and he tried to hit back but was somewhat limited by the format. I hope that what is being whispered among the few paying attention to Pakistan is correct and that is that Obama’s discussion of strikes is more political posturing than an actual plan because we can see from what the Bush administration has been doing for the last two months there that such tactics only enflame militants and drive regular people into their ranks. And it does nothing to address the real problem in Pakistan which is the multiple factions vying for control. Until that issue is resolved you don’t even know who you’re bargaining with.

McCain consistently misrepresented Patraeus’s position on Afghanistan and Obama should have hit him harder on that but the pundits will get around to it no doubt. The problem is I don’t think that Obama’s strategy of simply shifting the focus from Iraq to Afghanistan is a solid one either. We clearly are in desparate need of a new approach in the region and that was not articulated tonight. Obama realizes that the same strategies aren’t going to work but he hasn’t suggested any different ones.

As far as who won I will give this one to Obama by quite a bit but as I said it matters little when the questions, GOOD questions, from citizens no less, are ignored in favor of repetition of sound bites. People want details and if you won’t give them to them then how can you expect their vote? I’m very frustrated with this whole situation right now. The entire event is a farce. A real debate would have more than those two men on stage. Grrrrrrr.


~ by citizenworm on October 7, 2008.

One Response to “Final Thoughts on 2nd Presidential Debate”

  1. A real debate would have just those two men on the stage without the moderator. Political debates in this country are more like side by side speeches than a debate. They love having the moderator there to cut them off and inform them they are out of time and push them to the next topic because they only have two minutes of stuff to say about any topic anyway.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: